-
Recent Posts
- Milestones: Tetsuo Ogawa, to Succeed Jim Lentz as CEO Toyota Motor North America
- Ford Recalls Super Duty Vehicles for Carpet Fires
- Automakers Slow to Make Vehicles Safer?
- 2020 Ford Explorer – OK, Not Good in Crash Ratings
- Nissan Gets Tiny $24m SESC Kiss for False Filings
- 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid Claimed Best with EPA-Estimated 44 MPG City, 41 MPG Combined Fuel Economy Ratings
- Republican Rep. Christopher Collins Guilty of Insider Trading
- Cadillac Live – New Digital Showroom Launches
- OmniVision Claims Only Auto Sensors with HDR to 140dB
- Two New Safety Recalls at Ford Motor – F-Series and Explorer
- Chicago Auto Show – February 2020
- Thanksgiving 2019 – We Celebrate Our 399th Annual Feast
- GM Recalls More than 500k Pickup Trucks for Possible Burning Cloth Carpet After Seat Belt Pretensioners Activate
- Mercedes-Benz Recalls ‘Confused, Lost’ Emergency Call System
- First Electric Lexus Ever Debuts in China Today
News from PR Newswire
Recent Comments
- Milestones: Tetsuo Ogawa, to Succeed Jim Lentz as CEO Toyota Motor North America | AutoInformed on Toyota’s Growing $13 Billion Investment in U.S.
- 2020 Ford Explorer – OK, Not Good in Crash Ratings | AutoInformed on Driving 2020 Explorer: Big Size and Complexity, Bigger Price
- Driving 2020 Explorer: Big Size and Complexity, Bigger Price | AutoInformed on Whoops! Now Ford Motor Has Emissions Problems
- Nissan Gets Tiny $24m SESC Kiss for False Filings | AutoInformed on Renault Board Backtracking on Carlos Ghosn Innocence
- Fasten Your Seat Belt – General Motors Files RICO Lawsuit Against Fiat Chrysler Automobiles | AutoInformed on General Motors Q3 Earnings Hit Hard – $1.3B – by UAW Strike
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt
Sierra Club Michigan Opposes CAFE Cuts
In January under the Obama administration, the EPA finalized its proposed decision on fuel efficiency standards, originally set in 2012. The decision kept the fuel economy goals at their current level through year 2025. This decision came after a technical assessment report, a 30-day comment period, a proposed decision, and a second 30-day comment period. The Sierra Club and allies submitted more than 400,000 comments in support of the standards. Critics claim that the review was conducted too hastily. Continue reading