-
Recent Posts
- Teamsters to Honor Picket Lines of 50,000 UAW GM Workers
- General Motors Offers UAW $7 Billion in U.S. Investments, an $8000 “Signing Bonus” or is that Bribe?
- UAW to Strike GM – Contract Talks Deadlocked
- August Global Light Vehicle Sales Drop -3.9%
- Ford Recalls 311,907 Explorer SUVs for Dangerous Seat Frames
- GM Finally Recalls 3,456,111 SUVS, Pickups for Bad Brakes
- Electric Vehicle Charging Emissions – Good and Better?
- alice + olivia: The Rag Trade Meets a VW Rag Top
- Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa Forced Out Over Ghosn Matter
- Porsche Opens Zuffenhausen Factory for All-Electric Taycan
- Data Show GM Automated Safety Systems Prevent Crashes
- Chrysler Recalls More than 1.1 Million Ram Pickup Trucks for Unexpected Tailgate Openings While Driving
- Google Voice Assistant, Navigation and App to Debut at GM
- Western European Car Registrations Fall by -8.5%
- Brexit – UK Car Production Declines -10.6%. Exports Hit
News from PR Newswire
Recent Comments
- Execs Changed at Changan Ford China JV. European Transformation Ongoing | AutoInformed on Ford Shakes up European and International Markets as CFO Shanks Retires. Restructuring Continues as Stock Languishes
- My Friend Jim Dunne | AutoInformed on Caught Testing – the Revised 2014 Cadillac CTS?
- My Friend Jim Dunne | AutoInformed on Future Mustang and Lincoln Coupe?
- My Friend Jim Dunne | AutoInformed on Car Spy Jim Dunne Catches Revised Lincoln MKS or MKZ?
- My Friend Jim Dunne | AutoInformed on New 2014 Lincoln Compact SUV Caught by Jim Dunne
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Sierra Club Michigan
Sierra Club Michigan Opposes CAFE Cuts
In January under the Obama administration, the EPA finalized its proposed decision on fuel efficiency standards, originally set in 2012. The decision kept the fuel economy goals at their current level through year 2025. This decision came after a technical assessment report, a 30-day comment period, a proposed decision, and a second 30-day comment period. The Sierra Club and allies submitted more than 400,000 comments in support of the standards. Critics claim that the review was conducted too hastily. Continue reading